×
|
Movie Name : |
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald
|
Cinema Type : |
Hollywood
|
Release Date : |
16-Nov-2018( 6 years, 0 days ago)
|
Directed By : |
David Yates |
Production House : |
Steve Kloves,David Heyman |
Genre : |
Adventure |
Lead Role : |
Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston, Dan Fogler
|
Rating:3.5/5
From the get-go, it is evident that the second film in the prequel/spin-off to the ‘Harry Potter’ series is geared towards its dedicated fan-base. The focus firmly shifts from Newt Scamander and weighs down heavily on Grindelwald and his devious plans. The plot then veers away from what made the previous entry charming and fascinating; that is, those fantastic beasts. This is a much darker and grimmer film, perched largely on the shoulders of two of the most recognisable members from the ensemble cast - Johnny Depp & Jude Law. Depp gives his most menacing and restrained performance, thus infusing the adequate amount of intrigue into Gellert Grindelwald - one of the most feared and powerful wizards in the Potter universe. Equally fascinating is Grindelwald’s relationship with Albus Dumbledore (Jude Law), and how the fate of the world largely depends on the latter’s reluctance to engage with his former friend and ally. Law’s charismatic turn as the beloved wizard carries potential as he is bound to play a more significant role in the sequels to come. ‘The Crimes of Grindelwald’ makes it evident that this is the story of his past.
However, writer J.K. Rowling is also committed to serving the Potter fandom which results in a vast number of narrative strands that become tedious to follow. Characters previously introduced now fall by the wayside in subplots that don’t seem to have much weight within this film itself, as they’re all seemingly invested in future returns. Thus, Newt Scamander’s character arc bears as much consequence as a footnote, which is a disservice to Redmayne’s skittish and endearing portrayal of Dumbeldore’s former student. There’s also the looming question of Credence Barebone’s (Ezra Miller) heritage which asks more questions than it answers.